McClendon v. State
164 So. 2d 28, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4249
Opinion
Appellant’s motion for relief under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, denied in an order here appealed, fails to allege facts constituting a claim for relief under the aforementioned Rule. Although it appears that the lower court’s order denying the motion was based in part on matters dehors the record, we must, because of the aforementioned insufficiency of the motion, affirm. Cf. Webster v. State, Fla.App.1963, 156 So.2d 890.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McClendon v. State, 164 So. 2d 28, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4249 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).
164 So. 2d 28 (McClendon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Webster v. State
156 So. 2d 890 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)