McClendon v. Johnson

247 S.W. 665
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 25, 1923
DocketNo. 2690.
StatusPublished

This text of 247 S.W. 665 (McClendon v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McClendon v. Johnson, 247 S.W. 665 (Tex. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

HODGES, J.

This suit is a controversy between two claimants of a benefit fund based upon an insurance certificate issued to Hannah Williams. The amount involved is $158. Each party claims it as the last caretaker of the deceased, she having died without leaving any heirs so far-as known. The insurance association, known as the Grand Court Heroines of Jericho, was made a party to the suit. It admitted liability, paid the money into court, and asked that it be awarded to the party entitled to receive it.

According to the findings of the court, the insurance association adopted' a new constitution after the death of Hannah Williams, in which it permitted a benefit fund to be paid .to the last caretaker. Article 4832 of the Revised Civil Statutes provides who may be made beneficiaries in insurance policies, and caretakers are not mentioned among them. It may be true that Ray Johnson, the appellee, had no greater right than did the appellant. It is sufficient, however, to defeat the claim of the appellant, that he had no legal right at all.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 S.W. 665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclendon-v-johnson-texapp-1923.