McClendon v. Ikon Office Solutions, Inc.

Eighth Circuit

McClendon v. Ikon Office Solutions, Inc.

118 F. App'x 107

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedDecember 10, 2004

Docket04-1105

StatusUnpublished

This text of 118 F. App'x 107 (McClendon v. Ikon Office Solutions, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McClendon v. Ikon Office Solutions, Inc., 118 F. App'x 107 (8th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sheryleita McClendon appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her diversity action claiming sexual harassment in violation of the Minnesota Human Rights Act. After careful de novo review of the record, see Linville v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 335 F.3d 822, 823 (8th Cir.2003) (per curiam), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Sheryleita McClendon appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her diversity action claiming sexual harassment in violation of the Minnesota Human Rights Act. After careful de novo review of the record, see Linville v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 335 F.3d 822, 823 (8th Cir.2003) (per curiam), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 F. App'x 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclendon-v-ikon-office-solutions-inc-ca8-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack