McClendon v. Ikon Office Solutions, Inc.
Opinion
Sheryleita McClendon appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her diversity action claiming sexual harassment in violation of the Minnesota Human Rights Act. After careful de novo review of the record, see Linville v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 335 F.3d 822, 823 (8th Cir.2003) (per curiam), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
118 F. App'x 107 (McClendon v. Ikon Office Solutions, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.