McClements v. Ford Motor Co.

704 N.W.2d 68, 474 Mich. 1201
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 23, 2005·No. No. 126276·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinions

[1202]*1202On order of the Court, the motion for rehearing is considered and, in lieu of granting rehearing, the opinion of the Court is amended in the following respects:

At slip opinion pages 2,14,17,20 and 22 and in footnote 10 the phrase “the terms, conditions or privileges” is amended to read: “a term, condition, or privilege.”

In the third sentence of footnote 14 the phrase “alter the terms and conditions of employment” is amended to read: “affect an individual’s employment.”

In all other respects, the motion for rehearing is denied.

Cavanagh and Weaver, JJ. We would grant rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McClements v. Ford Motor Co., 704 N.W.2d 68, 474 Mich. 1201 (Mich. 2005).

704 N.W.2d 68 (McClements v. Ford Motor Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. Stark Reagan, PC
818 N.W.2d 367 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2011)
In Re Petition of Atty. Gen. for Investigative Subpoenas
736 N.W.2d 594 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2007)
Elezovic v. Ford Motor Co.
731 N.W.2d 452 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2007)
McLiechey v. Bristol West Insurance
474 F.3d 897 (Sixth Circuit, 2007)
Burl Mcliechey v. Bristol West Insurance Company
474 F.3d 897 (Sixth Circuit, 2007)
Maldonado v. Ford Motor Co.
719 N.W.2d 809 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)
McLiechey v. Bristol West Insurance
408 F. Supp. 2d 516 (W.D. Michigan, 2006)