McClelland v. Picher Lead & Zinc Co.

85 Mo. 636
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedApril 15, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 85 Mo. 636 (McClelland v. Picher Lead & Zinc Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McClelland v. Picher Lead & Zinc Co., 85 Mo. 636 (Mo. 1885).

Opinion

Sherwood, J.

Plaintiffs sold the defendant company three hundred thousand pounds of lead ore at a certain figure. Defendant received two hundred thousand pounds of the ore, but refused to receive the remainder, in consequence of which plaintiffs sold the same, and now sue to recover the difference between the contract price and that at which the mineral sold. The defendant company sold one hundred thousand pounds of the mineral to Murphy, but failed to notify plaintiffs ■of such sale, and consequently cannot complain that the mineral sold to Murphy was not delivered to him at his request. Such delivery, without notification of the fact of such proceeding from defendant to plaintiffs, would have been an unwarrantable breach of the contract by plaintiffs. The declarations of law given on the part of [637]*637plaintiffs, and the one given on the part of defendant, put the case very plainly, and as the finding of the issues was for the plaintiffs, we affirm the judgment.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Metal Co. v. Daugherty
102 S.W. 538 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 Mo. 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclelland-v-picher-lead-zinc-co-mo-1885.