McClelland v. Patterson
10 A. 475, 4 Sadler 264
Opinion
An examination of the facts of this case leads us to the conclusion that they were well disposed of in the court below, and that a proper exposition of the law applicable to them is contained in the charge of the learned judge who presided over the trial.
Judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McClelland v. Patterson, 10 A. 475, 4 Sadler 264 (Pa. 1886).
10 A. 475 (McClelland v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Simpkins v. Brooks
49 A.2d 549 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1946)
Thompson v. Hedrick
91 Pa. Super. 41 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)