McClelland v. McClelland
This text of 66 Tenn. 210 (McClelland v. McClelland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
A guardian who resides in another State with his wards, and has been regularly and properly appointed and qualified in such State, may file his bill in this State for the sale of real estate belonging to his wards.
The guardian has the management and control of the person and property of the ward, supplies its necessities and directs its education with the means of the trust estate. It is for these twofold purposes that the law requires a guardian, who, unlike an administrator, has control of the entire estate, real and personal.
While the foreign guardian may procure the sale, he can only receive the funds arising therefrom upon the execution, in the court having control of them, of a bond, under the direction of such court, for their proper management and applicotion.
Ordinarily, the Chancery Court is the proper one to exercise the jurisdiction indicated.
Reverse the judgment and remand the cause.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 Tenn. 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclelland-v-mcclelland-tenn-1874.