McClelland v. Lynch
This text of 98 N.Y.S. 640 (McClelland v. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff evidently sued the wrong person. The house upon which the work was done belonged to defendant’s wife, and that plaintiff understood that he was contracting with her is shown by the fact that the original estimate is addressed to her, and not to defendant. For this reason the judgment must be reversed, and it will not be necessary to consider the question whether the work was properly done, of which there seems to be much doubt.
Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
98 N.Y.S. 640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclelland-v-lynch-nyappterm-1906.