McClelland v. King Solomon Gold & Silver Quartz Mining Co.

1 Cal. Unrep. 205
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 6, 1865
DocketNo. 448
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cal. Unrep. 205 (McClelland v. King Solomon Gold & Silver Quartz Mining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McClelland v. King Solomon Gold & Silver Quartz Mining Co., 1 Cal. Unrep. 205 (Cal. 1865).

Opinion

SAWYER, J.

We -think the sixty days commenced to run from the date of the location. If so, the facts appearing in the verdict -and stipulation are sufficient to sustain the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

We concur: Sanderson, C. J.; Rhodes, J.; Currey, J.; Shatter, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Cal. Unrep. 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclelland-v-king-solomon-gold-silver-quartz-mining-co-cal-1865.