McClelland v. Johnson

131 F. App'x 940
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 20, 2005·No. No. 04-7787·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Stephen E. McClelland seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion for a temporary restraining order. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order McClelland seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Office of Pers. Mgmt. v. Am. Fed’n of Gov’t Employees, 473 U.S. 1301, 1303-04, 105 S.Ct. 3467, 87 L.Ed.2d 603 (1985); Drudge v. McKernon, 482 F.2d 1375, 1376 (4th Cir.1973). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McClelland v. Johnson, 131 F. App'x 940 (4th Cir. 2005).

131 F. App'x 940 (McClelland v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related