McClellan v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

McClellan v. State

131 S.E. 62, 161 Ga. 269, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 340

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 13, 1925·No. No. 4937·Published

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

The plaintiff in error was tried and convicted in the same trial with Coggeshall v. State, this day decided. Though they made separate motions for new trials, necessitating two writs of error, the evidence and the assignments of error in the two eases are identical, and the decision in this case is necessarily controlled by the judgment in Coggeshall v. State. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, C. J.

The plaintiff in error was tried and convicted in the same trial with Coggeshall v. State, this day decided. Though they made separate motions for new trials, necessitating two writs of error, the evidence and the assignments of error in the two eases are identical, and the decision in this case is necessarily controlled by the judgment in Coggeshall v. State. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

McClellan v. State, 131 S.E. 62, 161 Ga. 269, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 340 (Ga. 1925).

Pincite

131 S.E. 62 (McClellan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.