McClellan v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

McClellan v. State

127 So. 923, 23 Ala. App. 652

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 4, 1930

Docket8 Div. 857.

StatusPublished

This text of 127 So. 923 (McClellan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McClellan v. State, 127 So. 923, 23 Ala. App. 652 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

SÁMEORD, J.

We have examined the record in this case, and, while there are some exceptions reserved to the admission of testimony, every ruling of the court is clearly without error.

Charges refused to defendant were either erroneous or were substantially covered by the court in its oral charge.

We find no prejudicial error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SÁMEORD, J.

We have examined the record in this case, and, while there are some exceptions reserved to the admission of testimony, every ruling of the court is clearly without error.

Charges refused to defendant were either erroneous or were substantially covered by the court in its oral charge.

We find no prejudicial error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 So. 923, 23 Ala. App. 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclellan-v-state-alactapp-1930.