McClellan v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

McClellan v. State

127 So. 923, 23 Ala. App. 652

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided March 4, 1930·No. 8 Div. 857.·Published

Opinion

SÁMEORD, J.

We have examined the record in this case, and, while there are some exceptions reserved to the admission of testimony, every ruling of the court is clearly without error.

Charges refused to defendant were either erroneous or were substantially covered by the court in its oral charge.

We find no prejudicial error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SÁMEORD, J.

We have examined the record in this case, and, while there are some exceptions reserved to the admission of testimony, every ruling of the court is clearly without error.

Charges refused to defendant were either erroneous or were substantially covered by the court in its oral charge.

We find no prejudicial error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

McClellan v. State, 127 So. 923, 23 Ala. App. 652 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

127 So. 923 (McClellan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.