McClellan v. Florida Parole Commission

959 So. 2d 827, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10526, 2007 WL 1946492
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 6, 2007·No. No. 1D07-1791·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED as untimely. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.100(c)(1); Arce v. Maher Guiley & Maher, P.A., 936 So.2d 682 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (holding that a motion for rehearing directed to a non-final order does not suspend the jurisdictional time for seeking review of the order by certiorari because rehearing is not authorized as to non-final orders).

WEBSTER, DAVIS, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McClellan v. Florida Parole Commission, 959 So. 2d 827, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10526, 2007 WL 1946492 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

959 So. 2d 827 (McClellan v. Florida Parole Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related