McClave v. Gibb

64 N.Y. St. Rep. 876
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedJanuary 7, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 64 N.Y. St. Rep. 876 (McClave v. Gibb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McClave v. Gibb, 64 N.Y. St. Rep. 876 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Opinion

McAdam, J.

Under the pleadings, as construed by us. on the separate appeal taken from the judgment dismissing the complaint, the matters in respect to which the plaintiff claims to have been surprised were not material, and there was therefore no legal .reason why a new trial should have been granted, and, for that reason, the order denying the motion must be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 N.Y. St. Rep. 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclave-v-gibb-nysuperctnyc-1895.