McClasky v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad
This text of 16 Ind. 96 (McClasky v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complaint in this case charges that .the appellant, who was the defendant, on February 25, 1854, subscribed $500, it being twenty shares, of the capital stock of said railroad company, payable in such manner and proportion, and at such times, as the president and • directors of the company might direct; “ that defendant reserved the privilege of designating the kind of property in which he would pay the amount subscribed, and though often requested, &c., has failed to make such designation or pay said sum; to the plaintiff’s damages, $600, for which she demands judgment,” &c.
Defendant’s answer contains nine paragraphs. To the first, second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth, demurrers were sustained. The other defenses led to issues of fact. There was a verdict for the plaintiff, upon which the Court, over a motion for a new trial, rendered judgment.
The complaint is alleged to be defective because it makes no reference to any written contract of subscription; nor does it aver that any assessment or call had been made by the [97]*97directors. These objections seem to be well taken; and the defects in the complaint thus pointed out, being material, are no doubt available upon the demurrers to the answer. Price v. The Grand Rapids, &c. Railroad Co., 13 Ind. 58; Ross v. The Lafayette, &c. Railroad Co., 6 id. 297; Gebhart v. The Junction Railroad Company, 12 id. 484; Bolster v. Catterlino, 1 id. 117. Upon these decisions the judgment must be reversed.
The judgment is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded, &e.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 Ind. 96, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclasky-v-grand-rapids-indiana-railroad-ind-1861.