McClary v. Munns

Fourth Circuit

McClary v. Munns

651 F. App'x 183

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 1, 2016·No. No. 16-6114·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

TT . . ,. ,. Unpubhshec1 opinions are not bmding Preee en in is circuí.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald McClary appeals the district court’s order and judgment granting summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McClary v. Munns, No. 5:14-ct-03183-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 21, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

TT . . ,. ,. Unpubhshec1 opinions are not bmding Preee en in is circuí.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald McClary appeals the district court’s order and judgment granting summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McClary v. Munns, No. 5:14-ct-03183-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 21, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

McClary v. Munns, 651 F. App'x 183 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

651 F. App'x 183 (McClary v. Munns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related