McClary v. Fowlkes

Fourth Circuit

McClary v. Fowlkes

328 F. App'x 275

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 2, 2009·No. No. 08-8078·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joshua Brent McClary appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ [276] summary judgment motions on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims against them. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. McClary v. Fowlkes, No. 1:07-cv-01080-LO-TCB, 2008 WL 3992637 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 27, 2008; entered Aug. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joshua Brent McClary appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ [276] summary judgment motions on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims against them. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. McClary v. Fowlkes, No. 1:07-cv-01080-LO-TCB, 2008 WL 3992637 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 27, 2008; entered Aug. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

McClary v. Fowlkes, 328 F. App'x 275 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

328 F. App'x 275 (McClary v. Fowlkes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related