McClanahan's Adm'r v. Ware

Supreme Court of Alabama

McClanahan's Adm'r v. Ware

42 Ala. 381

DecidedJanuary 15, 1868

StatusPublished

This text of 42 Ala. 381 (McClanahan's Adm'r v. Ware) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McClanahan's Adm'r v. Ware, 42 Ala. 381 (Ala. 1868).

Pincite

Opinion

A. J. WALKER, C. J.

The only ground upon which the temporary injunction in this case could have been placed, was the agreement or understanding as to the payment in Confederate money. Such agreement or understanding, whether express or implied from circumstances, is denied by the answer. — Schieble v. Bacho, January term, 1868. The chancellor committed no reversible error in dissolving the injunction. No other point pertaining to the regularity of the decree dissolving the injunction has been presented in argument, and it is prudent for us to abstain from expressing an opinion on any other point.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A. J. WALKER, C. J.

The only ground upon which the temporary injunction in this case could have been placed, was the agreement or understanding as to the payment in Confederate money. Such agreement or understanding, whether express or implied from circumstances, is denied by the answer. — Schieble v. Bacho, January term, 1868. The chancellor committed no reversible error in dissolving the injunction. No other point pertaining to the regularity of the decree dissolving the injunction has been presented in argument, and it is prudent for us to abstain from expressing an opinion on any other point.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 Ala. 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclanahans-admr-v-ware-ala-1868.