McClain v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McClain v. State

673 So. 2d 966, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6234, 1996 WL 271605

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 23, 1996

DocketNo. 95-4294

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 673 So. 2d 966 (McClain v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McClain v. State, 673 So. 2d 966, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6234, 1996 WL 271605 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Larry Thomas McClain, appeals the denial of his motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). He claims he is entitled to relief under Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994), on the ground that he was improperly sentenced to consecutive habitual offender sentences for crimes arising out of the same criminal episode. Because such a claim is factually based, we affirm the denial without prejudice to his filing a proper and timely motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 directed to this issue. See State v. Callaway, 658 So.2d 983 [967]*967(Fla.1995); Pace v. State, 662 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

AFFIRMED.

WEBSTER, LAWRENCE and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Larry Thomas McClain, appeals the denial of his motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). He claims he is entitled to relief under Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994), on the ground that he was improperly sentenced to consecutive habitual offender sentences for crimes arising out of the same criminal episode. Because such a claim is factually based, we affirm the denial without prejudice to his filing a proper and timely motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 directed to this issue. See State v. Callaway, 658 So.2d 983 [967]*967(Fla.1995); Pace v. State, 662 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

AFFIRMED.

WEBSTER, LAWRENCE and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

673 So. 2d 966, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6234, 1996 WL 271605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclain-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack