McClain v. State

673 So. 2d 966, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6234, 1996 WL 271605
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 23, 1996·No. No. 95-4294·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Larry Thomas McClain, appeals the denial of his motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). He claims he is entitled to relief under Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994), on the ground that he was improperly sentenced to consecutive habitual offender sentences for crimes arising out of the same criminal episode. Because such a claim is factually based, we affirm the denial without prejudice to his filing a proper and timely motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 directed to this issue. See State v. Callaway, 658 So.2d 983 [967] (Fla.1995); Pace v. State, 662 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

AFFIRMED.

WEBSTER, LAWRENCE and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McClain v. State, 673 So. 2d 966, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6234, 1996 WL 271605 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

673 So. 2d 966 (McClain v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dublin v. State
681 So. 2d 865 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)