McClain v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania·Decided April 13, 2022·No. 1:19-cv-01951·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RALPH McCLAIN, : Civil No. 1:19-cv-1951 : Plaintiff, : : (Judge Sylvia H. Rambo) v. : : PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT : OF CORRECTIONS, et al., : : Defendants. : O R D E R AND NOW, this 13th day of April, 2022, upon consideration of the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 105), to which no objections have been timely filed, and the court having satisfied itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes; see also Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Intern., Inc., 702 F. Supp. 2d 465, 469 (M.D. Pa. 2010) (explaining that judges should review dispositive legal issues raised by the report for clear error), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1) The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED; 2) Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 99) is DISMISSED as moot; 3) The Clerk of Court shall remand this case back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. s/Sylvia H. Rambo United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McClain v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, (M.D. Pa. 2022).

McClain v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (McClain v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply International, Inc.
702 F. Supp. 2d 465 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 2010)