McClain v. Morse

60 N.W. 334, 42 Neb. 52, 1894 Neb. LEXIS 384
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided October 2, 1894·No. No. 5627·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Ryan, C.

< This action was brought in the district court of Douglas county by the appellee,'against the appellants, for an accounting in the settlement of a partnership which had existed between the several parties litigant. By this appeal there is presented only the correctness of the findings of fact made by a referee, whose allowance of the alleged' bill of exceptions was as follows:

“This bill of exceptions contains evidence given by both parties at the trial had before me, and is by me duly allowed on presentation by the defendant Clark.
“Frank L. Weaver,
“Referee.”

This fails to show that the evidence given was all that was given; hence; it is impossible for us to review the findr ings of fact of which complaint is made. (Turner v. Turner, 12 Neb., 161; Omaha & N. W. R. Co. v. Menk, 4 Neb., 24.) The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Irvine, C., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McClain v. Morse, 60 N.W. 334, 42 Neb. 52, 1894 Neb. LEXIS 384 (Neb. 1894).

60 N.W. 334 (McClain v. Morse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spence v. Lane
97 N.W. 478 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1903)
Olson v. Oregon Short Line Railroad
68 P. 148 (Utah Supreme Court, 1902)