McClain v. Haley

122 S.E.2d 600, 255 N.C. 728, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 664
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 22, 1961·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The negligence of an attorney, although inexcusable, if not imputable to the litigant may still be cause for relief. Rierson v. York, 227 N.C. 575, 42 S.E. 2d 902.

In the hearing below, the court found that neither the defendant nor his insurance carrier had been guilty of negligence; that the negligence of defendant’s counsel was excusable; and that the defendant has a meritorious defense to the action.

The judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McClain v. Haley, 122 S.E.2d 600, 255 N.C. 728, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 664 (N.C. 1961).

122 S.E.2d 600 (McClain v. Haley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rierson v. . York
42 S.E.2d 902 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1947)