McClain v. Florida Parole Commission

53 So. 3d 1051, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18354, 2010 WL 4909631
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McClain v. Florida Parole Commission. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3362
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 3, 2010·No. 1D10-2262·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Nathaniel C. McClain, an inmate in the custody of the Florida Department of Corrections, challenges the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We agree with appellant that the trial court was obligated to allow appellant to file a reply to the response filed below by the Florida Parole Commission, appellee. See Bard v. Wolson, 687 So.2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). Because the appellant’s petition below did not state a basis for relief, see Lopez v. Florida Parole Comm’n., 943 So.2d 199 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006), however, a show cause order should not have issued below. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of the petition for writ of habeas corpus.

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, VAN NORTWICK, AND THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McClain v. Florida Parole Commission, 53 So. 3d 1051, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18354, 2010 WL 4909631 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

53 So. 3d 1051 (McClain v. Florida Parole Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lopez v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N
943 So. 2d 199 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Bard v. Wolson
687 So. 2d 254 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)