McChesney v. Lucius Engineering Co.
This text of 167 A.D. 957 (McChesney v. Lucius Engineering Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff’s exceptions sustained and motion for new trial granted, with costs to plaintiff to abide event. Held, that it was a question of fact as to whether the defendant was negligent in furnishing a single plank to be used as a scaffold which was unsuitable and improper for the work which the plaintiff was required to do. All concurred, except Robson and Foote, JJ., who dissented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
167 A.D. 957, 152 N.Y.S. 1125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcchesney-v-lucius-engineering-co-nyappdiv-1915.