McChesney v. Lucius Engineering Co.
167 A.D. 957, 152 N.Y.S. 1125
Opinion
Plaintiff’s exceptions sustained and motion for new trial granted, with costs to plaintiff to abide event. Held, that it was a question of fact as to whether the defendant was negligent in furnishing a single plank to be used as a scaffold which was unsuitable and improper for the work which the plaintiff was required to do. All concurred, except Robson and Foote, JJ., who dissented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McChesney v. Lucius Engineering Co., 167 A.D. 957, 152 N.Y.S. 1125 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).
167 A.D. 957 (McChesney v. Lucius Engineering Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.