McCauley v. People

88 Ill. 578
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1878·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

When this case was called for trial, defendant entered a motion for a change of venue, on account of the prejudice of the judge presiding.

One objection taken is fatal to the application. The petition upon which the motion was based, was neither signed nor sworn to by defendant. There is no statute that authorizes any other person to petition for a change of venue on behalf of defendant, and the application was properly denied.

The other questions made are substantially the same as in McCann v. The People, ante, 103, and are decided in the same way.

The judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCauley v. People, 88 Ill. 578 (Ill. 1878).

88 Ill. 578 (McCauley v. People) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

The People v. Maynard
179 N.E. 833 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1932)
Carle v. State
1926 OK CR 137 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1926)
McHargue v. State
139 N.E. 316 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1923)
Raming v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
50 S.W. 791 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1900)