McCauley v. McCauley

124 N.W.2d 411, 267 Minn. 544, 1963 Minn. LEXIS 793
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided November 8, 1963·No. 38,933·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant in divorce proceedings appeals from an order of the district court granting his wife exclusive possession and occupancy of the home of the parties pending determination of the action. 1

We have reviewed the record and are satisfied that the trial court was acting within the area of its discretion in view of testimony reflecting that the tension between the litigants is such as to react unfavorably upon their three children, who must of necessity be maintained in the residence involved. See, Carlson v. Carlson, 234 Minn. 258, 48 N. W. (2d) 58; Minn. St. 518.62.

Affirmed.

1

Whether such an order is appealable has not been determined specifically. See, Schuster v. Schuster, 84 Minn. 403, 87 N. W. 1014; Brunn v. Brunn, 166 Minn. 283, 207 N. W. 616; Burkholder v. Burkholder, 231 Minn. 285, 43 N. W. (2d) 801; 4 Am. Jur. (2d) Appeal and Error, § 138.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCauley v. McCauley, 124 N.W.2d 411, 267 Minn. 544, 1963 Minn. LEXIS 793 (Mich. 1963).

124 N.W.2d 411 (McCauley v. McCauley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Johnson
298 A.2d 795 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1973)