McCauley v. Doe
This text of McCauley v. Doe (McCauley v. Doe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1931
GEORGIA ANNE MCCAULEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN OR JANE DOE, Dispatcher/Deputy; GARY DEMBO, Deputy; A. R. CAHO, Sergeant; WILLIAM JOHNSON, Sergeant; JAMES W. HAGY, Sheriff; FREDERICK COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-684-L)
Submitted: February 25, 2003 Decided: March 10, 2003
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Georgia Anne McCauley, Appellant Pro Se. J. Marks Moore, III, Samuel Maddox Riley, WEST & MOORE, L.L.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Georgia Anne McCauley appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See McCauley v. Doe, No. CA-02-684-L (D. Md. July
12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
McCauley v. Doe, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccauley-v-doe-ca4-2003.