McCauley v. Bessey

146 A. 816, 83 N.H. 588, 1929 N.H. LEXIS 116
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJune 27, 1929
StatusPublished

This text of 146 A. 816 (McCauley v. Bessey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCauley v. Bessey, 146 A. 816, 83 N.H. 588, 1929 N.H. LEXIS 116 (N.H. 1929).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a bill in equity, tried by the late Judge Doe, and resulting in the order “petition deified.” At the plaintiff’s request, the court began to make a draft of the facts he found, in order that the case be transferred to this court. This draft was not completed; and since the death of Judge Doe, the superior court (Sawyer, C. J.) has declared a mistrial.

The order of mistrial was not only authorized but apparently required by the situation in which the case was left. The defendant’s exceptions raise various questions which would be material upon a petition for a new trial, under the statute (P. L., c. 342), but they have no application to the present proceeding.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
146 A. 816, 83 N.H. 588, 1929 N.H. LEXIS 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccauley-v-bessey-nh-1929.