McCaughn v. Union Paving Co.
This text of 63 F.2d 258 (McCaughn v. Union Paving Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Suit was brought by Blakely D. McCaughn, who was collector of internal revenue at the time the defendants gave bond to him as collector. He was no longer in office at the time of suit. Since there was- the same failure to substitute the successive collectors iu the manner and within the time prescribed by the Act of February 8, 1899, as amended (28 USCA § 780), as existed in Ladner v. Philadelphia Barge Company et al. (C. C. A.) 63 F.(2d) 258, filed February 6, 1933, the case is ruled by the same law.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 F.2d 258, 12 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 165, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 3390, 1933 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9115, 12 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccaughn-v-union-paving-co-ca3-1933.