McCaughn v. Milliot

78 Miss. 976
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1901
StatusPublished

This text of 78 Miss. 976 (McCaughn v. Milliot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCaughn v. Milliot, 78 Miss. 976 (Mich. 1901).

Opinion

Terral, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellee sued the appellant for the freight ($180) agreed to be paid for an assorted cargo of building material to bo carried from the Mississippi coast to the head of Southwest Pass, and to be there delivered at McCaughn’s landing. Both parties met at place and time appointed for the delivery of the cargo, but, owing to a great rise in the waters, there was no wharf or place for landing the cargo, only mud and water everywhere; however, the ends of some piling appeared above the surface of the water, and appellant insisted that appellee should build a wharf, and place the cargo on it, while appellee demurred and declined the job of building the wharf. Several other landings were attempted — at South Pass,- Buras, Neptune and Mrs. Strickers — and while at Neptune two-thirds of the cargo was landed, one-third was left on board by mutual consent, and at the other places, except Neptune, the same condition as at Southwest Pass prevailed, so the one-third part of the cargo was not landed, but was carried by the schooner back to [977]*977Gulfport. The master of the schooner Lizzie Haas, had a verdict and judgment, and McCaughn appeals.

It is settled that a vessel carrying by sea, is only bound to deliver cargo at the usual wharf; nor is it the duty of the master to construct wharves. Clendamiel v. Tuckerman, 17 Barb., 184 ; Cope v. Cordova, 1 Rawle, 203 ; Gibson v. Culber, 17 Wend., 311 ; Hyde v. Nav. Co., 5 T. R., 387 ; Checkering v. Fowler, 4 Pick., 371 ; 2 Kent, No. 606 note.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clendaniel v. Tuckerman
17 Barb. 184 (New York Supreme Court, 1853)
Cope v. Cordova
1 Rawle 203 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1829)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 Miss. 976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccaughn-v-milliot-miss-1901.