McCaslin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
59 Pa. Super. 475, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 103
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 19, 1915·No. Appeal, No. 242·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Opinion by
Each of the assignments of error urged by the appellant is considered by Judge Broomall in the opinion filed in which the motions for a new trial and for judgment non obstante veredicto are refused, and we affirm the judgment for the reasons therein stated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCaslin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 59 Pa. Super. 475, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 103 (Pa. Ct. App. 1915).
59 Pa. Super. 475 (McCaslin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ross v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
169 A.2d 74 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1961)
Syme v. Bankers National Life Insurance
144 A.2d 845 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1958)