McCaslin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
59 Pa. Super. 475, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 103
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 19, 1915
DocketAppeal, No. 242
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 59 Pa. Super. 475 (McCaslin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McCaslin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 59 Pa. Super. 475, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 103 (Pa. Ct. App. 1915).
Opinion
Opinion by
Each of the assignments of error urged by the appellant is considered by Judge Broomall in the opinion filed in which the motions for a new trial and for judgment non obstante veredicto are refused, and we affirm the judgment for the reasons therein stated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ross v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
169 A.2d 74 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1961)
Syme v. Bankers National Life Insurance
144 A.2d 845 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1958)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
59 Pa. Super. 475, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccaslin-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-pasuperct-1915.