McCaskill v. Texaco, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

McCaskill v. Texaco, Inc.

365 So. 2d 667, 1978 Ala. LEXIS 1840

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 22, 1978·No. 77-664·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

To prevail on appeal, under well-established rules of review, it is incumbent upon the aggrieved party to show manifest error below prejudicial to the Appellant’s substantial rights. Having carefully considered the entire record on appeal, along with the briefs and arguments of counsel, we find that the Appellant has not met this burden.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

To prevail on appeal, under well-established rules of review, it is incumbent upon the aggrieved party to show manifest error below prejudicial to the Appellant’s substantial rights. Having carefully considered the entire record on appeal, along with the briefs and arguments of counsel, we find that the Appellant has not met this burden.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

McCaskill v. Texaco, Inc., 365 So. 2d 667, 1978 Ala. LEXIS 1840 (Ala. 1978).

Pincite

365 So. 2d 667 (McCaskill v. Texaco, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.