McCaskill v. . McCaskill, Admr.
This text of 140 S.E. 289 (McCaskill v. . McCaskill, Admr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Civil action brought by Florence E. McCaskill against the administrators of her father's estate to recover on contract or quantum meruit for services rendered defendants' intestate over a period of three years immediately prior to his death.
Upon denial of liability and a counterclaim set up for board and lodging of plaintiff's three small children during the time she was at defendants' intestate's home, the jury returned the following verdict:
"1. What amount, if any, is the plaintiff, F. E. McCaskill, entitled to recover of the defendants, J. C. McCaskill et al., administrators of A. B. McCaskill, deceased? A. $1,620.
"2. What amount, if any, are the defendants, J. C. McCaskill et al., administrators of A. B. McCaskill, deceased, entitled to recover of the plaintiff, F. E. McCaskill? Answer: $864."
From a judgment on the verdict in favor of plaintiff for the difference between the amounts set down as answers to the first and second issues, the defendants appeal, assigning errors. The controversy on trial narrowed itself to issues of fact, determinable alone by a jury. No reversible error has been made to appear on any of appellants' exceptive assignments of error. The verdict and judgment, therefore, will not be disturbed.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 S.E. 289, 194 N.C. 812, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccaskill-v-mccaskill-admr-nc-1927.