McCaskill Investment Company v. Green

Supreme Court of Florida

McCaskill Investment Company v. Green

120 So. 555, 97 Fla. 290

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 25, 1929·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon the authority of Brett v. The First National Bank of Marianna, this day filed, the decree herein is reversed insofar as it decrees recovery of attorney fees. The decree is otherwise affirmed. The cause is remanded for appropriate proceedings.

It is so ordered.

Whitfield, P. J., Buford, J., and Giblin, Circuit Judge, concur. Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Upon the authority of Brett v. The First National Bank of Marianna, this day filed, the decree herein is reversed insofar as it decrees recovery of attorney fees. The decree is otherwise affirmed. The cause is remanded for appropriate proceedings.

It is so ordered.

Whitfield, P. J., Buford, J., and Giblin, Circuit Judge, concur. Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

McCaskill Investment Company v. Green, 120 So. 555, 97 Fla. 290 (Fla. 1929).

Pincite

120 So. 555 (McCaskill Investment Company v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related