McCaskill Investment Co. v. Bank of Thomasville

Supreme Court of Florida

McCaskill Investment Co. v. Bank of Thomasville

139 So. 896, 104 Fla. 300

DecidedFebruary 19, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 139 So. 896 (McCaskill Investment Co. v. Bank of Thomasville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCaskill Investment Co. v. Bank of Thomasville, 139 So. 896, 104 Fla. 300 (Fla. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

—This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record and the decree herein and the brief and argument of counsel *301 for the appellant and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the decree. It is therefore considered, ordered, and decreed by the court that the said decree of the Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

—This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record and the decree herein and the brief and argument of counsel *301 for the appellant and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the decree. It is therefore considered, ordered, and decreed by the court that the said decree of the Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 So. 896, 104 Fla. 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccaskill-investment-co-v-bank-of-thomasville-fla-1932.