McCarty v. Smith
This text of McCarty v. Smith (McCarty v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6005
GERALD LEE MCCARTY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM E. SMITH; ARCHIE BRUTON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:09-ct-03126-D)
Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 6, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gerald Lee McCarty, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Gerald Lee McCarty appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. McCarty v. Smith, No. 5:09-ct-03126-D (E.D.N.C. Nov. 30,
2010). We deny McCarty’s motion to appoint counsel. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
McCarty v. Smith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccarty-v-smith-ca4-2011.