McCarty v. Rudge & Guenzel Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

McCarty v. Rudge & Guenzel Co.

230 N.W. 956, 119 Neb. 887, 1930 Neb. LEXIS 142

Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided May 16, 1930·No. No. 27241·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff while a passenger in an elevator in defendant’s store. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the district court for Lancaster county sustained a motion for a directed verdict made by defendant Rudge & Guenzel Company. Plaintiff thereupon dismissed her case against another defendant and has appealed.

We have carefully examined the record and find it to be free from prejudicial error. The judgment of the district court is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff while a passenger in an elevator in defendant’s store. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the district court for Lancaster county sustained a motion for a directed verdict made by defendant Rudge & Guenzel Company. Plaintiff thereupon dismissed her case against another defendant and has appealed.

We have carefully examined the record and find it to be free from prejudicial error. The judgment of the district court is therefore

Affirmed.

McCarty v. Rudge & Guenzel Co., 230 N.W. 956, 119 Neb. 887, 1930 Neb. LEXIS 142 (Neb. 1930).

Pincite

230 N.W. 956 (McCarty v. Rudge & Guenzel Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.