McCarty v. McCarty

166 A. 154, 113 N.J. Eq. 145, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 1001
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 27, 1933·Published

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

This is a wife’s suit for divorce on the ground of desertion. The case was referred to an advisory master, who filed written conclusions, in which he held that desertion had been proved, and advised a decree for petitioner, and the husband appeals. Our examination of the evidence satisfies us that the advisory master reached the right result, and the decree is therefore affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Pabkee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heheb, Yan Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCarty v. McCarty, 166 A. 154, 113 N.J. Eq. 145, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 1001 (N.J. 1933).

166 A. 154 (McCarty v. McCarty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.