McCarty v. McCarty

166 A. 154, 113 N.J. Eq. 145, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 1001
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 27, 1933
StatusPublished

This text of 166 A. 154 (McCarty v. McCarty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCarty v. McCarty, 166 A. 154, 113 N.J. Eq. 145, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 1001 (N.J. 1933).

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

This is a wife’s suit for divorce on the ground of desertion. The case was referred to an advisory master, who filed written conclusions, in which he held that desertion had been proved, and advised a decree for petitioner, and the husband appeals. Our examination of the evidence satisfies us that the advisory master reached the right result, and the decree is therefore affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Pabkee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heheb, Yan Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 A. 154, 113 N.J. Eq. 145, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 1001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccarty-v-mccarty-nj-1933.