McCarty v. McCarty

Louisiana Court of Appeal

McCarty v. McCarty

160 So. 2d 437, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1298

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJanuary 9, 1964

DocketNo. 10092

StatusPublished

This text of 160 So. 2d 437 (McCarty v. McCarty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCarty v. McCarty, 160 So. 2d 437, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1298 (La. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

HARDY, Judge.

In due course this case was fixed for argument or submission on the calendar of this court Wednesday, December 4, 1963. No appearance has been made nor brief filed by the appellant. In this instance neither has any appearance been made nor brief filed on behalf of appellee.

Under Rule VTI, Section 5(h) of the Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal,'8 LSA-R.S. which has been interpreted and enforced by the several courts in a large number of cases, the court is authorized, under these circumstances to consider the appeal abandoned and dismiss the same.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed at appellant's cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARDY, Judge.

In due course this case was fixed for argument or submission on the calendar of this court Wednesday, December 4, 1963. No appearance has been made nor brief filed by the appellant. In this instance neither has any appearance been made nor brief filed on behalf of appellee.

Under Rule VTI, Section 5(h) of the Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal,'8 LSA-R.S. which has been interpreted and enforced by the several courts in a large number of cases, the court is authorized, under these circumstances to consider the appeal abandoned and dismiss the same.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed at appellant's cost.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 So. 2d 437, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccarty-v-mccarty-lactapp-1964.