McCarty v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION
This text of 930 So. 2d 846 (McCarty v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Benjamin A. McCARTY, Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, and Samsonite Co. Stores, Inc., Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Benjamin A. McCarty, in proper person.
John D. Maher (Tallahassee), for appellee Unemployment Appeals Commission.
Before WELLS and SHEPHERD, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
PER CURIAM.
No error has been demonstrated in the ruling of the appeals referee as affirmed by the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, that the appellant was disqualified from benefits because of misconduct for repeated absences and tardiness. See Mason v. Load King Mfg. Co., 758 So.2d 649 (Fla.2000); Sanchez v. Dep't of Labor & Employment Sec., 411 So.2d 313 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
930 So. 2d 846, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9698, 2006 WL 1628033, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccarty-v-florida-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-2006.