McCarty v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION

930 So. 2d 846, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9698, 2006 WL 1628033
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 14, 2006·No. 3D06-181·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

930 So.2d 846 (2006)

Benjamin A. McCARTY, Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, and Samsonite Co. Stores, Inc., Appellees.

No. 3D06-181.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 14, 2006.

Benjamin A. McCarty, in proper person.

John D. Maher (Tallahassee), for appellee Unemployment Appeals Commission.

Before WELLS and SHEPHERD, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

No error has been demonstrated in the ruling of the appeals referee as affirmed by the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, that the appellant was disqualified from benefits because of misconduct for repeated absences and tardiness. See Mason v. Load King Mfg. Co., 758 So.2d 649 (Fla.2000); Sanchez v. Dep't of Labor & Employment Sec., 411 So.2d 313 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCarty v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, 930 So. 2d 846, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9698, 2006 WL 1628033 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

930 So. 2d 846 (McCarty v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

De La Torre v. New Century Mortgage Corp.
935 So. 2d 1264 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)