McCarty v. Boulevard Commission
106 A. 891, 92 N.J.L. 519, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 288
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Black in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCarty v. Boulevard Commission, 106 A. 891, 92 N.J.L. 519, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 288 (N.J. 1918).
106 A. 891 (McCarty v. Boulevard Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Galik v. Clara Maass Medical Center a Hospital Corp.
771 A.2d 1141 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2001)
Galik v. CLARA MAASS MED. CENTER
771 A.2d 1141 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2001)
Bernstein v. BD. OF TRUST. TEACHERS'PEN. & ANN. FUND
376 A.2d 563 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)
Albanese v. MacHetto
68 A.2d 659 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)