McCarty v. Bosart
This text of 74 N.E. 1128 (McCarty v. Bosart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellee sued appellants upon a promissory note executed to her decedent by them. She had judgment for the principal, interest and stipulated attorney fee thereon. The court found that McCarty was principal, and his codefendants, sureties, and ordered execution to be levied accordingly.
The contention of the sureties was that they had been released by an extension of the time of payment of said note given by appellee to McCarty upon a consideration. The finding of the court was against them, and it is not without support in the evidence.
No other question is involved in the appeal, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 N.E. 1128, 36 Ind. App. 702, 1905 Ind. App. LEXIS 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccarty-v-bosart-indctapp-1905.