McCartney v. Administrators of Smalley

11 Iowa 85
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedOctober 6, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 Iowa 85 (McCartney v. Administrators of Smalley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCartney v. Administrators of Smalley, 11 Iowa 85 (iowa 1860).

Opinion

Wright, J.

This was not a negotiable note in such a sense that according to the law merchant, the maker was entitled to three days of grace. It was not thus negotiable certainly at common law, and in this respect our Code has made no change. The act of 1853, (Section 3, ch. 108, p. 188,) applies to notes and bills as defined and understood in the commercial law, and not to notes payable in property or anything else than money, and which last instruments are by our law assignable and may be negotiable according to their tenor and effect. If payable in any thing else than money they have all the incidents of negotiability, where such was the manifest intent of the maker, but the use of the word “order” or “bearer” will not alone manifest such intention. Code section 947, 949 and 950. And see 3 G. Greene 334; 1 Iowa, 490; 7 Ib. 145 , Peddecord & Wyman v. Whitham 9 Iowa 471; Billingham v. Bryan 10 317 Iowa; Luckey v. Pepper, Mor. 490; such intent is not manifest from the instrument sued on in this case.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Culbertson v. Nelson
27 L.R.A. 222 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Iowa 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccartney-v-administrators-of-smalley-iowa-1860.