McCartney, James Wesley
This text of McCartney, James Wesley (McCartney, James Wesley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-35,575-26 AND WR-35,575-27
EX PARTE JAMES WESLEY MCCARTNEY, Applicant
ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. CR92-0532-A-W-9 AND CR92-0533-A-W-9 IN THE 51ST DISTRICT COURT FROM TOM GREEN COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex
parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of capital
murder and aggravated kidnapping and sentenced to imprisonment.
In his present applications, Applicant raises several grounds. The applications, however,
present a more serious question. This Court’s records reflect that Applicant has filed many prior
habeas applications pertaining to these convictions. It is obvious from the record that Applicant
continues to raise issues that have been presented and rejected in previous applications or that should 2
have been presented in previous applications. The writ of habeas corpus is not to be lightly or easily
abused. Sanders v. U.S., 373 U.S. 1 (1963); Ex parte Carr, 511 S.W.2d 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974).
Because of his repetitive claims, we hold that Applicant’s claims are barred from review under
Article 11.07, § 4, and are waived and abandoned by his abuse of the writ. These applications are
dismissed.
Therefore, we instruct the Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals not to accept or file the
instant applications for writs of habeas corpus, or any future application pertaining to these
convictions unless Applicant is able to show in such an application that any claims presented have
not been raised previously and that they could not have been presented in a previous application for
a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Bilton, 602 S.W.2d 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980).
Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional
Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.
Filed: April 3, 2019 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
McCartney, James Wesley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccartney-james-wesley-texcrimapp-2019.