McCarthy's Case
149 N.E. 606, 253 Mass. 553, 1925 Mass. LEXIS 1309
Opinion
The principles stated and amplified in Brode’s Case, 251 Mass. 414, decided since the hearings before the Industrial Accident Board, indubitably and imperatively require the conclusion that the employee is not entitled to compensation on the facts here disclosed. The case at bar is distinguishable from Hunnewell’s Case, 220 Mass. 351, and Weir’s Case, 252 Mass. 236.
Decree reversed.
Decree to be entered in favor of insurer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCarthy's Case, 149 N.E. 606, 253 Mass. 553, 1925 Mass. LEXIS 1309 (Mass. 1925).
149 N.E. 606 (McCarthy's Case) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hummer's Case
59 N.E.2d 295 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1945)
Ziccardi's Case
192 N.E. 29 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1934)
Casieri's Case
190 N.E. 118 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1934)
Panagotopulos's Case
177 N.E. 800 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1931)
Hanson's Case
162 N.E. 341 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1928)