McCarthy v. Walsh Construction Co.

240 A.D. 750

This text of 240 A.D. 750 (McCarthy v. Walsh Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCarthy v. Walsh Construction Co., 240 A.D. 750 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Decedent having been the owner and defendant Lincoln the driver of the automobile which collided with the road barrier and steam roller, any causative negligence in defendant Lincoln is beyond question attributable to decedent and would defeat plaintiff’s action as against the appellant Walsh Construction Company. (Gochee v. Wagner, 257 N. Y. 344.) The only specification of negligence as to the appellant which by concession of appellant’s counsel upon the argument survives in this court is a failure by the construction company to indicate the presence of the road obstruction by “ necessary lights which shall be visible to any one approaching such obstruction from one hour after sunset to one hour before sunrise.” (Highway Law, § 77.) We have reached the conclusion that the findings (1) that appellant Walsh Construction Company was causatively negligent in not having necessary lights upon this barrier at the time Lincoln ran against it, and (2) that defendant Lincoln was free from causative negligence himself were against the weight of the evidence. All concur. Judgments and orders reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants severally to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gochee v. Wagner
178 N.E. 553 (New York Court of Appeals, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
240 A.D. 750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccarthy-v-walsh-construction-co-nyappdiv-1933.