McCarthy v. Vincent

915 F.2d 1572, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 23606, 1990 WL 153914
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedOctober 12, 1990
Docket90-3718
StatusUnpublished

This text of 915 F.2d 1572 (McCarthy v. Vincent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCarthy v. Vincent, 915 F.2d 1572, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 23606, 1990 WL 153914 (6th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

915 F.2d 1572

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Daniel R. MCCARTHY, Trustee, Harold M. Bowman, Individually
and on Behalf of Themselves and all other Limited
Partners of the New York Yankees, an
Ohio Limited Partnership,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Francis T. VINCENT, Jr., John M. Dowd, New York Yankees, An
Ohio Limited Partnership, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-3718.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 12, 1990.

Before BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr. and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and WISEMAN, Chief District Judge*.

ORDER

Plaintiffs-Appellants appeal the district court's order denying their application for a temporary restraining order prohibiting the resignation of the New York Yankees general partner George M. Steinbrenner and seek a stay from this Court. Defendants now move to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the denial of a temporary restraining order is not appealable. See Leslie v. Penn Cent. R.R. Co., 410 F.2d 750 (6th Cir.1969) (per curiam). The defendants also assert this appeal is moot as it seeks to prevent a resignation which has already occurred. The plaintiffs oppose the motion to dismiss.

Upon review of this matter, we find the motion to dismiss to be well taken. It is ORDERED that this appeal be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

*

The Honorable Thomas A. Wiseman, Jr., Chief District Judge for the Middle District of Tennessee, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

James D. Leslie v. Penn Central Railroad Company
410 F.2d 750 (Sixth Circuit, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
915 F.2d 1572, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 23606, 1990 WL 153914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccarthy-v-vincent-ca6-1990.