McCarthy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McCarthy v. State

177 So. 2d 63, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 3905

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 29, 1965

DocketNo. 64-899

StatusPublished

This text of 177 So. 2d 63 (McCarthy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCarthy v. State, 177 So. 2d 63, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 3905 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court properly denied appellant’s motion for relief pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, where the record shows testimony was taken after defendant’s guilty plea, and defendant now contends in his motion that the court failed to take testimony to determine the degree of the crime charged pursuant to § 909.11 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. See: Sampson v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 771.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court properly denied appellant’s motion for relief pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, where the record shows testimony was taken after defendant’s guilty plea, and defendant now contends in his motion that the court failed to take testimony to determine the degree of the crime charged pursuant to § 909.11 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. See: Sampson v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 771.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 So. 2d 63, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 3905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccarthy-v-state-fladistctapp-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack