McCarthy v. State
177 So. 2d 63, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 3905
Opinion
The trial court properly denied appellant’s motion for relief pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, where the record shows testimony was taken after defendant’s guilty plea, and defendant now contends in his motion that the court failed to take testimony to determine the degree of the crime charged pursuant to § 909.11 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. See: Sampson v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 771.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCarthy v. State, 177 So. 2d 63, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 3905 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).
177 So. 2d 63 (McCarthy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sampson v. State
158 So. 2d 771 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)