McCarthy v. Scofield

766 N.W.2d 826

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McCarthy v. Scofield. Read the opinion of the Court — 486 Mich. 1075 →

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 23, 2009·No. 138034·Published

Opinion

766 N.W.2d 826 (2009)

Patrick McCARTHY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Alison SCOFIELD, Department of Human Services, Andrea Dean, Oakland County Prosecutor, Amy Allen, Child Abuse & Neglect House/Oakland County Care House, Carole Boyd, Oakland County Friend of the Court, Thomas Callahan, and Milford Police Department, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 138034. COA No. 284129.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

June 23, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's March 23, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

766 N.W.2d 826 (2009)

Patrick McCARTHY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Alison SCOFIELD, Department of Human Services, Andrea Dean, Oakland County Prosecutor, Amy Allen, Child Abuse & Neglect House/Oakland County Care House, Carole Boyd, Oakland County Friend of the Court, Thomas Callahan, and Milford Police Department, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 138034. COA No. 284129.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

June 23, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's March 23, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

McCarthy v. Scofield, 766 N.W.2d 826 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

766 N.W.2d 826 (McCarthy v. Scofield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.