McCarthy v. Sano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McCarthy v. Sano

44 N.Y.S. 1122

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 44 N.Y.S. 1122 (McCarthy v. Sano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCarthy v. Sano, 44 N.Y.S. 1122 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Whether or not the assignment in this case was fraudulent and .void as [1123]*1123against creditors was a question of fact for the referee, which he has determined in favor of the defendants. The facts found by the referee are sufficient to sustain his conclusions of law, and, as there is no certificate that this case contains all the evidence, the findings of fact cannot be reviewed by this court; and it follows that the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Whether or not the assignment in this case was fraudulent and .void as [1123]*1123against creditors was a question of fact for the referee, which he has determined in favor of the defendants. The facts found by the referee are sufficient to sustain his conclusions of law, and, as there is no certificate that this case contains all the evidence, the findings of fact cannot be reviewed by this court; and it follows that the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 N.Y.S. 1122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccarthy-v-sano-nyappdiv-1896.